 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
| Domestic Violence |
With so much written about conflict resolution, you might get the
impression that it's a very difficult thing to achieve. Actually…as a
police officer, you have a unique tool that no other practitioner of
conflict resolution possesses. It's called the power of arrest.
Foul…foul! Sorry. Arrest is not a politically correct form of true
conflict resolution except in instances of domestic violence. In cases of
domestic violence, where a man is almost always the aggressor — or the
one who usually does the most damage — it's now perfectly acceptable,
and expected, to use arrest as a resolution of first resort. While arrest
as a resolution for domestic violence is the only effective resolution for
a domestic violence incident, it, like every other process deemed to be
politically correct, can be abused.
Imagine yourself as a detective lieutenant. One of your sergeants is in
charge of your domestic violence squad. The sergeant is trying to leave
his wife. Everyone in the unit has sympathy for the sergeant, because
those members who know his wife are unanimous in their support of his
pending escape. On the eve of that escape, there is the expected
argument between husband and wife. Following the argument, the wife
leaves the home. Several hours later, there's a knock at the door.
The sergeant opens his front door where he's greeted by two uniformed
police officers. The officers explain that his wife has made an allegation
of domestic violence against him. The officers tell your sergeant that
they've been ordered, by their lieutenant, to place him under arrest.
The officers are very apologetic. They explain that they don't believe
his wife since she changed details of her account several times during an
interview, and a hospital examination revealed no evidence of injury.
Think about this. The crime alleged is a misdemeanor assault not
committed in an officer's presence. There's no evidence of injury to the
alleged victim. There are no exigent circumstances such as the victim
being in imminent danger. Even under expanded domestic violence
laws, an arrest warrant should have been obtained. Had the warrant
application been presented to a court commissioner or magistrate not
enslaved to political correctness, the court official may have had pause
due to the changing account by the alleged victim. In reality, I don't
think any such warrant issuing authority exists anywhere when it comes
to a police officer accused of domestic violence.
Anyway…on with the story. The officers execute the technically false
arrest and off they go. When you learn of the arrest, your conversation
with the lieutenant who ordered the arrest only confirms what the
arresting officers told your sergeant. Nobody believed the wife…but,
hey…everybody has to cover his ass.
It only gets worse. The next day the alleged incident is all over the six
and eleven o'clock television news complete with TV footage of the
sergeant's house. The following morning, the story is on the front page
of the metro section of your city's daily newspaper. That afternoon, you
get a telephone call from the reporter who wrote the newspaper story.
You tell the reporter that while you cannot discuss any details of the
incident, you assure him that there is "no story." The reporter doesn't
let up. He continues to ask you questions in an effort to wear you
down. You hold fast…but, he slips. He reveals to you that the
sergeant's wife called him. He realizes he screwed up, because the line
falls silent. You then take the initiative, and you get him to admit that
this was the first time he knew of; wherein, an alleged victim of
domestic violence made the initial contact with a newspaper reporter.
The call ends with you believing you've reasoned reasonably with a
reasonable man. No such luck. The next morning you read the second
story on the front page of the metro section. The television coverage
lasts another two days.
The only thing that made the false allegation of domestic violence
newsworthy was the sergeant's position as the supervisor of an
investigative domestic violence squad. Had he just been a regular cop,
the groundless media assault against him would have only lasted one
day instead of three.
Your sergeant's luck does improve. While internal domestic violence
investigations can last many months, your sergeant is back to duty in
one month. And…yes, he made good on his escape.
impression that it's a very difficult thing to achieve. Actually…as a
police officer, you have a unique tool that no other practitioner of
conflict resolution possesses. It's called the power of arrest.
Foul…foul! Sorry. Arrest is not a politically correct form of true
conflict resolution except in instances of domestic violence. In cases of
domestic violence, where a man is almost always the aggressor — or the
one who usually does the most damage — it's now perfectly acceptable,
and expected, to use arrest as a resolution of first resort. While arrest
as a resolution for domestic violence is the only effective resolution for
a domestic violence incident, it, like every other process deemed to be
politically correct, can be abused.
Imagine yourself as a detective lieutenant. One of your sergeants is in
charge of your domestic violence squad. The sergeant is trying to leave
his wife. Everyone in the unit has sympathy for the sergeant, because
those members who know his wife are unanimous in their support of his
pending escape. On the eve of that escape, there is the expected
argument between husband and wife. Following the argument, the wife
leaves the home. Several hours later, there's a knock at the door.
The sergeant opens his front door where he's greeted by two uniformed
police officers. The officers explain that his wife has made an allegation
of domestic violence against him. The officers tell your sergeant that
they've been ordered, by their lieutenant, to place him under arrest.
The officers are very apologetic. They explain that they don't believe
his wife since she changed details of her account several times during an
interview, and a hospital examination revealed no evidence of injury.
Think about this. The crime alleged is a misdemeanor assault not
committed in an officer's presence. There's no evidence of injury to the
alleged victim. There are no exigent circumstances such as the victim
being in imminent danger. Even under expanded domestic violence
laws, an arrest warrant should have been obtained. Had the warrant
application been presented to a court commissioner or magistrate not
enslaved to political correctness, the court official may have had pause
due to the changing account by the alleged victim. In reality, I don't
think any such warrant issuing authority exists anywhere when it comes
to a police officer accused of domestic violence.
Anyway…on with the story. The officers execute the technically false
arrest and off they go. When you learn of the arrest, your conversation
with the lieutenant who ordered the arrest only confirms what the
arresting officers told your sergeant. Nobody believed the wife…but,
hey…everybody has to cover his ass.
It only gets worse. The next day the alleged incident is all over the six
and eleven o'clock television news complete with TV footage of the
sergeant's house. The following morning, the story is on the front page
of the metro section of your city's daily newspaper. That afternoon, you
get a telephone call from the reporter who wrote the newspaper story.
You tell the reporter that while you cannot discuss any details of the
incident, you assure him that there is "no story." The reporter doesn't
let up. He continues to ask you questions in an effort to wear you
down. You hold fast…but, he slips. He reveals to you that the
sergeant's wife called him. He realizes he screwed up, because the line
falls silent. You then take the initiative, and you get him to admit that
this was the first time he knew of; wherein, an alleged victim of
domestic violence made the initial contact with a newspaper reporter.
The call ends with you believing you've reasoned reasonably with a
reasonable man. No such luck. The next morning you read the second
story on the front page of the metro section. The television coverage
lasts another two days.
The only thing that made the false allegation of domestic violence
newsworthy was the sergeant's position as the supervisor of an
investigative domestic violence squad. Had he just been a regular cop,
the groundless media assault against him would have only lasted one
day instead of three.
Your sergeant's luck does improve. While internal domestic violence
investigations can last many months, your sergeant is back to duty in
one month. And…yes, he made good on his escape.
Talk about
stress...
stress...
Domestic Violence
and the male
police officer
and the male
police officer
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| Copyright © 2006 - 2008 - Barry M. Baker - CareerPoliceOfficer.com |
| Disclaimer |
| CareerPoliceOfficer.com is not responsible for the contents of any linked site or any link contained in a linked site, or any changes or updates to such sites. Links are provided only as a convenience, and the inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement by this site. |